It will come as no surprise to most of us that violent people use violent language. In fact, Americans as a cultural group have a national base-line of colloquial and cultural usage that leans toward the violent. We “take a stab at” things; we “blow up” rather than just lose our temper. We even use the word “kill” quite often in casual phrases: I could kill him; it’s killing me; that’s a killer car.
Does this make us a violent nation? We ARE a violent nation. Whether the language contributed to this, or whether the violence contributes to the language is a moot point. What I have discovered in my work as a language/literary/verbal forensics consultant is a pattern in those who commit violence. Those who use such language frequently— often in a gas-lighting or manipulative way— are more likely to kill.
I first took note of this while reviewing a video taped interrogation of a subject who was being questioned in connection with the death of his live-in girlfriend. His insistence that he was innocent in any wrong doing included the following buzz-phrases:
- I would never hurt a woman.
- I hate men who hurt women.
- I could never hurt a helpless woman.
- I’d kill somebody who did that to my girlfriend/mother/sister.
- Men who beat women are scum.
Since I had seen this as a pattern so common it had become routine, I interviewed two psychologists who worked with inmates who were convicted of domestic violence. Dr. Alexandra Kelly and Dr. Stephen Medlin both reported finding the same common thread: abusers find their own behavior repugnant in others; abusers use gas-lighting language to express the opposite of what they DO in respect to what they SAY; and abusers appear to very-nearly universally use extremely violent language in describing other abusers.
What can we learn from this? When comparing what Doctors Kelly and Medlin have learned from inmates to interviews with survivors of domestic violence, a predicting pattern emerges. Men who repeatedly and forcefully portray themselves as hero-types, rescuers or protectors, but who use violent language are far more likely to be abusers, themselves. Ironically, very often the men who are most adamantly verbal are the more violent— even homicidal— of abusers.
Warning signs/phrases:
- I’d kill anyone who hurt…
- Men like that should be killed/castrated.
- I could never harm a weaker/harmless/innocent … (HERE the abuser is actually creating exceptions for his violence; if she isn’t innocent he can harm her, if she’s “tough,” or fights back, she isn’t “weaker.”)
- I once beat the hell out of a guy for… (HERE the abuser is confessing to being violent, but justifying it.)
We can all be more actively aware of language, signals, and predictors in violent behavior. Tough talk may well be a warning sign.
0 comments ]:[ Add your comment:
Post a Comment